“The trouble is, you think you have time.”

Spotted here:

This is another one from Jack Kornfield’s Buddha’s Little Instruction Book (1994), which isn’t a collection of Buddha quotes, but is Jack’s rather lovely interpretation of Buddhist teachings.

According to the publisher:

Just as the serene beauty of the lotus blossom grows out of muddy water, Buddha’s simple instructions have helped people to find wholeness and peace amid life’s crisis and distractions for more than 2,500 years. For this small handbook, a well-known American Buddhist teacher and psychologist has distilled and adapted an ancient teaching for the needs of contemporary life. Its practical reminders and six meditations can infuse smallest everyday action with insight and joy.

It’s a charming book, although the title has led many people to think that its contents are quotations from the Buddhist scriptures. In some cases that appears to be so, but most of the aphorisms seem to be Jack’s own thoughts.

Thanks to an alert commenter (Paxski), I was able to track where Jack got this quote from. Paxski had heard Jack use this quotation in one of his talks on CD, where he attributed it to Don Juan. Paxski wasn’t sure which Don Juan this was, but a hunch told me that it was probably the (fictional?) Yaqui shaman from Carlos Castaneda’s books. And indeed, I found the following in Journey to Ixtlan, Castaneda’s third book:

There is one simple thing wrong with you – you think you have plenty of time … If you don’t think your life is going to last forever, what are you waiting for? Why the hesitation to change? You don’t have time for this display, you fool. This, whatever you’re doing now, may be your last act on earth. It may very well be your last battle. There is no power which could guarantee that you are going to live one more minute.

So this another version of the “timeless” reminder that time is brief and that we should make good use of it.

Shorn of this context, though, as it is in Buddha’s Little Instruction Book, I’ve often thought that this quote might be a little counter-productive. I know what the quote was intending to say, but what is it we don’t have time for? The quote doesn’t say. I certainly hope I have time to get enlightened. Of course I don’t know how much time is available to me, but if I’m being told that I don’t, in fact, have time, then what’s the point? The quote’s intention is to point out that we don’t have time to waste, but not having time to waste is not the same thing as not having time. We do have time, or at least we have some time, and the question is how we’re going to use it.

Shorn of its context, I think that this particular quote may be an example of what Daniel Dennett has called a “deepity.” Here’s an adaptation of Wikipedia’s account of that term:

Deepity is a term employed by Dennett in his 2009 speech to the American Atheists Institution conference, coined by the teenage daughter of one of his friends. The term refers to a statement that is apparently profound but actually asserts a triviality on one level and something meaningless on another. Generally, a deepity has (at least) two meanings; one that is true but trivial, and another that sounds profound, but is essentially false or meaningless and would be “earth-shattering” if true.

It would be earth-shattering to say, truthfully, that we don’t have time. But it’s essentially false. Still, this is me over-thinking the quote. As I mentioned, I knew the first time I read it what it meant. It’s just a little ambiguous. And not something the Buddha said, although he said similar things:

  • “Unindicated and unknown is the length of life of those subject to death.” (Source)
  • “Those who have come to be, those who will be: All will go, leaving the body behind. The skillful person, realizing the loss of all, should live the holy life ardently.” (Source)
  • “I have reckoned the life of a person living for 100 years: I have reckoned the life span, reckoned the seasons, reckoned the years, reckoned the months, reckoned the fortnights, reckoned the nights, reckoned the days, reckoned the meals, reckoned the obstacles to eating. Whatever a teacher should do — seeking the welfare of his disciples, out of sympathy for them — that have I done for you. Over there are the roots of trees; over there, empty dwellings. Practice jhana, monks. Don’t be heedless. Don’t later fall into regret. This is our message to you all.” (Source)
  • Life is swept along, next-to-nothing its span. For one swept to old age no shelters exist. Perceiving this danger in death, one should drop the world’s bait and look for peace. (Source)
If you like it, share it!
Share on TumblrShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on FacebookEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on Twitter

13 thoughts on ““The trouble is, you think you have time.””

  1. What Don Juan was saying was you don’t have time to be in a crappy mood. So whatever you do, you must decide that it is worthy of your last act on earth. So for example, if you decide to brush your teeth then you must do it like you were to die afterwards. Otherwise if you do it like it was just something you had to do, then you just wasted 5 minutes (or however long it takes to teeth brush) of your time.

    1. I’ve read the passage in The Jouney to Ixtlan, Ron, and it’s nothing to do with not having time to be in a crappy mood. It’s about not committing to excellence (in this case excellence in hunting) because of a lack of urgency. Unless I’ve missed something?

  2. Setting aside the question of whether, having come from a Buddhist teacher, this quote is in fact attributable to Buddha, I feel that you’ve missed something essential. In my view, it IS time that we think we have but don’t. Castaneda’s quote clarifies the point; rather than thinking of death as distant (i.e. that we have time), he emphasises the imminence of death at every moment, THIS moment: “This, whatever you’re doing now, may be your last act on earth.” In other words, the inevitability of death nullifies the time that precedes it.

    You ask “if I’m being told that I don’t, in fact, have time, then what’s the point?” But what are you really asking? What’s the point of what?

    1. I’m actually not interested in over-thinking the quote. I’m just making the point that extracted from its context the quote lacks specificity. Buddhism, of course, suggests that we reflect often on death so that we take life seriously. That’s certainly not something I’m quibbling with!

    2. I do not agree that “the inevitability of death nullifies the time that precedes it”. It accentuates it. It makes the time preceding death that much more important when it comes to completing what we hold as imperatives in the time that remains…because he will come like a thief in the night.

  3. Why wrap a pointer in a context? The quote, whether it comes from Buddha, Don Juan, or the lady next door, stands on its own. And my ‘sense’ (the least unreliable of human tools of discernment, experience being one of its parts) is that it points towards truth.

    We don’t have time, because it’s something we can’t ‘have’ – although we pretend to have it.

    1. “Why wrap a pointer in a context?” Of course you’ve just put the quote in a context of sorts by explaining what you think it means 🙂

      The main thing I’d doing on this site is not questioning the truthfulness or usefulness of quotes (although I’ll sometimes comment on that, but questioning the truthfulness of their attributions. Why wrap quotes in the context of “this is something said by the Buddha” when in fact they aren’t? (And that’s a rhetorical question!)

  4. A fallacious assertion Buddha never made. We all do not want anyone to provide their fallacious statements about what Buddha stated.

    But above all matters, we all know we’ll all be dead in the end. We could focus on the fundamental question of how we are going to do “meaningful” things in life, within our limited time period.

    Most of us do not know what the “meaningful thing” would be in life. As we age, some of us may be able to find answers for themselves. Some would never find them. For some, it is a singular event that provide the with “meaningful thing”. For some, it may refer to a series of events that fulfills their heart. Whatever it may be, our quest and search for the “meaningful thing” encompasses our continual and endless challenges that we all are inclined to take on. We are all made that way. Buddha may be able to guide us on this. Just may be.

  5. I would actually see the point of the quote, in referring to Buddhist thought, as relating to the idea that time is an illusion, which contributes to problems including our sense of separateness, ego, not being present due to preoccupation with past and future, etc. as opposed to referring to the finite nature of time in this lifetime, or the imminence of death…

  6. This may not be a quote from Shakyamuni Buddha, but it is certainly a quote from the Buddha. Do you not feel time nipping at your heels as you discuss this pointless junk?

    1. Your first sentence is meaningless, I’m afraid.

      Do I feel time nipping at my heels? Of course, Jesse! But I don’t find helping people to know whether quotes are scriptural or not to be a waste of time. The Buddha (Shakyamuni Buddha) encouraged his disciples to do just that. When we hear that some quote is purported to be part of his teaching, then…

      Carefully studying the sentences word by word, one should trace them in the Discourses and verify them by the Discipline. If they are neither traceable in the Discourses nor verifiable by the Discipline, one must conclude thus: ‘Certainly, this is not the Blessed One’s utterance; this has been misunderstood by that bhikkhu — or by that community, or by those elders, or by that elder.’ In that way, bhikkhus, you should reject it.

      Of course what did he know? 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *